LABOUR IS FULL OF QUEERS

Look at this twat.

Matthew Hancock, my own MP, it has been revealed to me, thinks this is funny.

'quite full of queers' well shit dude, I guess that's us done, then. We're totally full of homosexuality, and this makes us completely unfit to run a government. I suppose we'd better all of us put on our pink triangles and board the last train for Toryschwitz.

God.

What was he thinking? He can't possibly believe that, right? This must have just been poor judgement on his part, because... well... Britain just isn't that radical, right?

Only in a radical society are Doctors striking to prevent a harmful contract that would endanger the lives of all their patients from coming into force viewed as extremists. Only in a radical society is a man meant to represent the views and best interests of thousands and thousands of people allowed to get away with using 'gay' or 'queer' or 'dyke' as an insult. Now, he only used one of those - as far as I know, in public - but the effect is similar to using all of them.

It makes it more acceptable for his supporters to lash out too.

Never mind the fact that the poem was terribly written, never mind the fact that he found it on Twitter of all places, never mind the fact that he looks like a boiled egg with teeth and a crappy middle aged man's haircut.

Mind instead that he has been shown to support the views we now see as immoral, and in many ways and cases, illegal, in this country.

Mind instead that he has done this, and has experienced no disciplinary action from the higher ups in his party/

Which, honestly, makes me think they support that too. It makes me think they don't really care too much about hate crime. It makes me think they really do view themselves as national CEOs and not governors and statesmen and stateswomen.

It makes me think that none of them really care.

Not that I thought they did before.

If we need any more proof that the Tories are bigots - which we don't, but I'm interested in making this post long enough to constitute decent content - let's just remind ourselves of David Cameron, the utter fuck.

He recently claimed that Sadiq Khan is close to ISIL supporters. How did he do this? By repeatedly bringing up that Mr. Khan has, 9 times, shared a platform with a 'hate preacher'.

Who is this? Suliman Ghani.

Now, I will admit, I had recalled hearing his name in relation to hate preachers and other fuck filled asswits, but when I looked him up, I could tell instantly that this was not that man. No sir, not at all. In fact, as far as I can see, this gentleman is actually a pretty cool guy. He's been given awards for community service, he speaks out against the evils of Daesh/ISIL, not for them, you FUCKASS Cameron, and he vocally supports the Junior Doctors in their struggle against capitalists trying to nick the NHS.

Suliman Ghani is alright.

I've heard that Khan is a Blairite, and maybe I don't know enough about the situation to really make a judgement, but he also seems alright. Certainly I prefer him to Boris 'I'm an Outie' Johnson.

Fun fact about Boris 'build-a-bike' Johnson, everyone: He's the descendant of deposed Ottoman royalty. His ancestry is the same as Khan's, Suliman's, and every other non-converted muslim in London, pretty much, only instead of being part of The People, they ruled the People.

And as a guy with some Kurdish blood myself, who's done his research... yeah. They ruled with an iron fist.

Just saying, there's a whole lot of hypocrisy on the side of the Tories, as there always has been, and I'm seriously happier voting for a career politician who's on the Red team than I am voting for a viciously career politician, on the Blue team.



Thanks for having a read, please do share the post and let all your friends know that Matthew Hancock is a twatcock.

~ Baxster Brand

I am Terribly Sorry

Hey, everyone. I'm sorry. I've been unable to bring myself to write anything quality about anything happening currently, because of how unbelievably stupid this all is.

I really wanted to write an article - or a rant, I suppose, but in England it's the same thing - about the blatant, obvious, criminal voter fraud committed against Bernie Sanders and his supporters in the recent New York Democratic Primary.

I mean, 3.4 Million people essentially had their voting rights revoked by the DNC, as their registration was suspiciously found to be 'independent' rather than 'democrat' on the day of the primary. There were also twitter accounts telling everyone to go and vote wearing their official Bernie supporters' regalia and buttons and stuff, which, believe it or not, is actually illegal in America. Rarely enforced, but you can bet it was on the day.

And you know what? It sucks that I failed to write about it, because it would have made for a nice, long, entertaining article, full of my swearing and anger, and those of you who are politically minded would have found it very inflaming indeed - which is the idea - and those of you who aren't would at least have found my language entertaining.

After all, who else refers to Bill Clinton as a 'petulant, immature little goosetwat' in casual conversation?

Actually, if you know anyone who does, put me in touch with them. I'd love to buy them a drink.

And you know what else I want to post about? Bill Clinton putting his foot in his mouth again, and telling millennials they're all fucking idiots - thanks, you rapist fuck faced large chinned bastard.

I also wanna post about Chelsea Clinton, their daughter - and if she hadn't literally come out of Hillary I'd ask for a DNA test to check who the mother is, knowing that fuckass Bill and his 'tendencies' - accidentally addressing Bernie Sanders as 'President Sanders' in an interview with the press!

HOLY SHIT DO I WANT TO POST ABOUT THAT.

I can't believe she let that happen. See? It's on their minds too. They know this shit is the way to go. Only greed is stopping them from throwing down their arms, surrendering their forces, and joining us in the good fight- the GREAT fight.

Oh, by the way, they tried to bully Sanders about his position on healthcare of all things.

There's that video for you.

Now that's a man I'd take up a weapon for, if it came down to it.

Fortunately, that is unlikely. I doubt I'd last long against those trigger happy Republican wankers anyway, with their absurdly large firearms.

I'm actually kind of worried that this gun was ever allowed to exist. No joke.

Uh, let's see here, what else did I wanna post about?

I WANTED TO POST ABOUT TRUMP.

Trump recently - or now, not so recently - made a statement about abortion that should leave you literally throwing up your intestines, because it's just so...

So fascist.

I know we like to call him a fascist, and I know it's pretty accurate, but at this point, it should really be at it's scariest for us all.

I'll show you. Though, serious warning here, I know this is a sensitive subject, don't feel pressured to look. I honestly feel bad about putting this badly coloured in far right joke on this blog anyway.

He thinks women should be punished, but that the man responsible for the pregnancy should suffer nothing.

Which is odd, because men are generally involved in some way.

And what else did I want to post about?

Everything. Guys, I want to post about everything. It's not fair to say that this blog is 'exploding' or 'blowing up' but it is a lot more popular already than I ever thought it would be, and I don't think it's showing any reasonable signs of stopping soon, if you guys keep telling your political friends you find me funny.

So please do.

And I'm sorry about my inability to post about everything I want to. Truth is, I'm a pretty run-down guy, without nearly as much time on his hands as he'd like, and this is very much a spare time thing. I'll try to get it down, but I've also gotta say that how often I write is also pretty dependent on my ability to work myself up into a rage about it, enough to swear copiously and vow vengeance against people I don't know, understand, or really bear all that much personal ill will towards.

Except Trump.

And the Clintons - although Chelsea might not be a monster yet.

And-

Actually no there are plenty of people I have genuine ill will against, but not like murder. More like, I hope they drop a kitchen knife on their big toe.

And this whole 'working myself up' thing is actually pretty unhealthy anyway. I need to see if I can do this without anger.

Thank you, though. Please, please tell your friends. It lights up my day to know people read the shit I write.

Thank you, so very much.

~ Baxster Brand

The BBC and their great failure

"You have failed to report - again - on the 150,000 people marching in London against Austerity policies, and the incredible damage they do to the unfortunate, and those in need. You are not a private corporation, and you are not unaccountable for your actions. Your purpose is not to serve those in the government, nor is it to serve those in the money, your purpose is to serve the People of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and you are failing. We are, after all, the ones who fund you.

I and many others consider this to be a terrible injustice, that our great BBC should have fallen so low as to not cover something so big, purely for its political context. I should not need to say that we are all disappointed. We were once so proud of you, and now we hang our heads in shame for it.

But it's not too late. You can still cover it. I implore you, friends, to think of your people, and not of those who would and are doing them harm. Speak out for us, lest there be nobody left to speak out for you when it's your turn."

- Baxster Brand, 17th April 2016.


This is the text content of a complaint I have recently filed to the BBC, regarding their failure to cover news regarding a protest currently ongoing in London, with more than 150K people to the crowd, against the policies of austerity instituted by the Government. I would urge all of you to do the same.

The BBC is a company formed under the Royal Charter, which was the original method for company registration, and as such is technically independent of the state. It is also not funded privately, no matter how much of their work is now outsourced.

If you own a TV, or a computer, or any fixture or device in your home capable of receiving a television signal, then regardless of whether you use it or not, you will be compulsorily charged either £49 a year, for a black and white television - which nobody really uses any more, so this is more of a redundant part of the contract  - or £145 a year, for your colour television.

This is not bad.  This is the BBC Licence fee, and it is how we fund public services, as this effectively amounts to a Public Information Tax.

Honestly? I think the prices are quite reasonable. The BBC is not an inexpensive beast, and it provides us with a great deal of entertainment, and information. It is also true that pretty much all of the 1156 TV transmitters located in the UK - of which there are varying types and heights - will be used by most, if not all, TV services, from Sky to BBC to Virgin to whatever. I don't know what channels exactly there are, I don't watch much TV.

And this licence fee pays for their upkeep, and the British government presumably taxes corporations for their use.

When they aren't letting the corporations avoid tax, that is.

Anyway.

The BBC Licence Fee is reasonable, and I willingly accept it, even though I don't really watch too much TV.

But this makes the BBC a public service. And public services have an obligation to... well, serve the public.

For the BBC to fail so terribly to cover such a large protest against the Austerity Policies of HM Government, and the party in power - the Conservatives, if you've been living under a rock - is an absolute travesty. This is your money being used against you. Not just taken, but actively used against you.

It is unjustifiable.

So I urge all of you to follow the link I shall now paste below, and flood the BBC with complaints, until there's nothing left for them to do but give in. Remind them that they serve the Public, at the discretion of the Public, on the funding of the Public - and that we are the Public.

Complain here, and complain loudly.


Thanks for reading, please do show this to your friends, and have a lovely day.

~ Baxster Brand

Bernie Sanders just did something amazing

He's proposed that the American Constitution be amended.

Which is a big thing to say. Seriously. A massive, massive things, and of course he's doing it for the right reasons as always, but wow.

I'm surprised.

For anyone here not familiar with how serious the Americans tend to take their constitution, just imagine the reactions you get every time you suggest, even politely - which I'll admit I sometimes have trouble doing - that the Queen might be a poor expenditure of valuable resources.

Or, you know, that she's more of a scrounger that the rest of us combined.

Or actually, just imagine the row you'd get from publicly screaming at the Queen. Suggesting that she's an idiot. Suggesting that she needs to not be phased out as a British Republican would advise, but... just changed.

Actually that might have been a bad example.

Imagine instead the feeling you get when somebody suggests that the core tenets of your personal political beliefs are utter bullshite.

This is how some people will feel. Inevitably. Because to them, the American Constitution are that which their country was built on, and shall survive on - and they're largely not wrong, I must say. But Mr. Sanders does raise a good point when he informs us that...

"... Amazingly enough we do not have in our constitution the right to vote as a constitutional right, we leave it up to the states. That's where I get passionately upset."

And rightly so.

What does he propose?

A constitutional amendment rendering all those above the age of 18 eligible to vote, I quote "... end of discussion..."

I fucking love this guy.

He goes on to say that what the Republicans are doing in trying to make it harder for people to vote is, get this, not criminal, not simply a dick move, but UnAmerican.

And I agree.

For all the past spite and anger between our two nations of people, we have one thing in common and that is the mutual desire for freedom. Freedom from oppression, from pain, from poverty. And actually, I must say that this is not simply a common ground between America and the UK, it is a common ground with the entirety of our race.

You and me, and all of them.

We want to be free.

To be free, we must be free first to influence the world around us, and Bernie Sanders would give everyone  that right.

I can only say, as I have said before, and will forever repeat, that I put my faith in Bernie Sanders just as much as I do in Jeremy Corbyn, just as much as I do in the new Canadian Government, just as much as I do in you.

Yeah. You.

Because I've already said it, but you and I are the same.

We both just wanna be free. There's nothing wrong with that. It's natural, and good.

And I reckon, whoever you vote for, you'll end up contributing to the advancement of the human race, one way or another. Just like me, I hope.

Man, these always end up being more emotional than I intend.


Have a lovely evening, and be safe.

~ Baxster Brand

I'm stunned

That post about Jeremy Corbyn supposedly being a nazi - according to the Daily Mail - just hit almost 140 pageviews. That's the most I've ever had by far, considering that every other post never hit 50.

Is this a sign of the kind of content you want? Is it just sensationalism? I don't know, but please, tell your friends all about me. If I can work up enough popularity to put Google Ads on here, I can use the revenue to start traveling around and making Tory MPs feel uncomfortable with loud questions about their expenses, and tax avoidance.

Thanks again, everyone.

~ Baxster Brand

BERNIE 'BIRDIE' SANDERS, EVERYONE

Bernie Sanders, the main brain, Bernie Sanders, my best guy, Bernie Sanders, just won his 7th Victory in a ROW in America. Not only that but it was in Wyoming!

For reference, Wyoming is referred to by The Guardian as 'cowboy land' so yeah, this is impressive.

Speaking of the Guardian, here's their article on it.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/09/bernie-sanders-wins-wyoming-seventh-state-unstoppable-new-york-primary-next

Now let's just dissect it.

They suggest that to many, Bernie Sanders, who - much like our Labour Leader, Jeremy Corbyn - started out as a very minor individual in the democratic race, whom few took seriously and fewer enjoyed the company of, but - again, just like our leader, J.C. - became a momentous and historically significant force for good, and a true sign of the rise of the left, may now look unstoppable to most.

They're right. He looks unstoppable to me. And I don't want him stopped, nor should you. He's not only a good man, he's a good politician. He's more experienced than Clinton, he's more intelligent than Clinton, and by jove, he's certainly more popular than Clinton right now - unless we're counting bankers.

Which we're not.

And probably never will.

The Guardian does, however, make mention of the fact that while he is very much on the rise - and Clinton does appear to be on something of a downwards trajectory - Hillary Clinton is still the democratic frontrunner at this point. It's not so clear cut as the republican one at this point, which seriously worries me, but there is still a rather major difference. Bernie is going to need to win pretty much all the seats from here to the end of the primaries and caucuses rather decisively. If he doesn't come out on top then, at least he can start to make a case for Clinton's 400 or so 'special delegates' whatever the shit that means, to join him instead.

Which I believe he would do quite well, actually.

I mean, his sensational performance aside, and the clear omens of nature - by which I mean Birdie Sanders, and I do dearly hope he gets a pet canary or something after this to commemorate that bird - we only have to look at history itself to understand just why he's such a good candidate.

The reason is Revolution.

Now, I understand that so much of the young, radical left use that term - and indeed overuse it - like it's a smartphone, but please understand that I mean the attitudes of revolution, and the incredibly fast paced change it brings, not so much the fires and the executions.

Although I wouldn't mind seeing Donald Trump investigated a little.

But seriously. I believe in Bernie Sanders not because he's the most economically viable candidate, not because he's the most cunning bastard on the block, not because he's got the best military record, but because he's the best son of a bitch to bring about change, and that's exactly what America needs. Hell, it's what Britain needs, and sorely too.

I'd even go as far as to say that it's what the whole damn world needs.

For the record, I'm in no way admitting that Mr. Sanders is economically incompetent, unintelligent, or a coward. In fact he's consistently proven himself to be the exact opposite of all of these things.

I'm just saying... guys, we need change. We need to change.

I was once told, and I'm not sure who by, that whenever we find ourselves on the side of the majority, we must pause and take a good long look at ourselves, that we might be sure we have not, in our passion to do good, begun doing the work of evil.

Ah. Just googled it.

It was Mark Twain.

Another of his good quotes was "... Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear, and the blind can see."

That's actually one of the most beautiful things I've ever read. I had to pause for a moment.

And that's exactly why I like Bernie Sanders. Same reason I like Jeremy Corbyn. Same reason I'll be a socialist from this waking moment 'til the second I die, and every eternity thereafter. Same reason I hope only to live and die having done right by the People, and not just the people of England, or Britain, or Europe, but the whole bloody world.

Same reason I hope for this revolution.

Because the world does not have to be cruel, and we do not have to be cruel people. We can be kind and loving, and the world can be beautiful.

We must simply stand together. For this strange and complex race of individuals is like an ocean.


And nothing can hold back the tide forever.




Thanks for having a read. Have a good night, everyone.

And be safe.

~ Baxster Brand

Daily Mail seems to think Corbyn is a nazi

Take a look at this shit.

Can you believe them? They're equating Palestine - an oppressed country who are the original inhabitants of land that is being stolen by Israel - with 'white south africa' and Zionists with 'blacks'.

What the fuck guys? I gotta say this is a pretty new low even for them - but I doubt it'll have any impact, of course.

Nobody intelligent takes these fucks seriously.

~ Baxster Brand

Clinton, you little twat.

No, actually this time I'm not talking about Hillary Clinton. I'm talking about Billary Clinton. The fuckass who used to be President, but still occasionally acts like he is.

Or worse.

For example.

This.

Now before I go on a bit of a ramble about just how much I love The Young Turks - and I do, they're brilliant, and I wish the whole of Turkey was more like them - let's just remind ourselves that Hillary Clinton was calling black kids 'super predators' and telling the world that they should be 'brought to heel'. I mean, good ol' Cenk Uygur goes over this, and he's a smart guy.

"... it could have been white kids too... but the line 'super predators' was used to denigrate African American kids back in the day, so that's a historial certainty..." 

And he's right.

Bill Clinton's response?

"YOU ARE DEFENDING THE PEOPLE WHO KILL THE LIVES YOU SAY MATTER! TELL THE TRUTH!" - Bill Clinton, literally a few days ago, at an event to promote his wife's presidency campaign...

Whilst shaking and waggling his index finger at the Black Lives Matter protester.

Yeah. Condescending twat and I fucking hate this wanker.

Cenk goes on to talk about the prison industrial complex, and all sorts of things, but I'm going to split my path from his here, because I don't just wanna talk about Bill Clinton's fantastic racism and finger waggling.

I want to talk about the crowd's reaction.

Because they cheered him. And jeered the protester. Which isn't right, is it? I mean come on guys, they're not being violent, they're not being rude, they're interrupting something official to try and get a message out - and a message is exactly what they're getting out, because when they did this to Bernie Sanders, he gave them the podium. 

These protesters are giving us the best signals to follow regarding presidential aptitude, based solely on the reactions they get.

Let's run through it.

1. Bernie Sanders gives up his podium to them, and then praises their will to speak, and determination for their cause. He then goes on to speak about how it's so rare to see that, and how racism is a systemic, institutionalised thing, and how we get rid of it. 

2. The Clintons shout, get angry, and wiggle fingers at people. At least once, a protester is removed from the premises. They also take huge sums of money for giving talks. Not once do they seriously talk about racism or inequality until it's clear that it would be profitable for them.

3. Trump actively encourages violence against protesters. Enough said. He's no democrat and arguably I should have left him out here, but I felt it was nice for the contrast to Sanders. Also, these are the three biggest candidates, wouldn't you say? 

Come on.

We all know who the best guy for the job is.

Sanders.

Cool Old Guy all the way.

Thanks for having a read, all.

~ Baxster Brand

Oh God look at what I found

Ha! Ha ha HA! The best part about it is... it's totally fucking true.

Brick it, Hillary.

~ Baxster Brand

PS: If anyone knows who made this, please comment and let me know. I need to buy them a drink or something.

Just wanna remind everyone...

Hillary Clinton told everyone that Bernie Sanders did not back a certain Paris Climate Change Agreement...

When he had actually called it a 'step in the right direction'.

Fuck you, Clinton. I'll admit I'd prefer you to Trump, but I'd prefer fucking Scrooge McDuck to him, so that's really not saying a lot.

#HillarySoQualified indeed.

~ Baxster Brand

PS: That tag has a stupid ass name too.

LBC thinks Jeremy Corbyn should resign

http://www.thecanary.co/2016/04/06/media-giant-just-jumped-camerons-aid-attacking-corbyn-instead-tweets/

Just... just read that. That's all you need to know on the situation, really. Couldn't have put it better myself.

~ Baxster Brand

The Panama Papers

Well, this is a right fine mess, isn't it, ladies and gentlemen? I mean, we all knew our wondrous leaders and good friends in government were greedy bastards, with their thumbs up their bums and their fingers in each other's pies, but now we have it in writing.

Ha.

Ha, ha, fuckity ha.

Let's just run through what these Papers really are, shall we?

"The Panama Papers are an unprecedented leak of 11.5m files from the database of the world’s fourth biggest offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca."

 - The Guardian, 3rd of April, 2016. Arguably one of Britain's most reliable news sources, as well. I believe they've only been biased once or twice in all of history - and even then, it was for causes that honestly deserved it.

I do like the Guardian, I must admit.

But... what are these papers about?

"The documents show the myriad ways in which the rich can exploit secretive offshore tax regimes. Twelve national leaders are among 143 politicians, their families and close associates from around the world known to have been using offshore tax havens."

- ... also The Guardian, on the 3rd of April, 2016. Same article, in fact. But they're really saying what we already know. Do we get any specifics out of this brilliant British bastion of journalism?

Fuck yes we do.

"A $2bn trail leads all the way to Vladimir Putin.The Russian president’s best friend – a cellist called Sergei Roldugin – is at the centre of a scheme in which money from Russian state banks is hidden offshore. Some of it ends up in a ski resort where in 2013 Putin’s daughter Katerina got married."

I have only occasionally seen Putin in an even remotely favourable light. This man is a dictator in all but 'official' classification, and I wouldn't mind seeing him imprisoned for his crimes. Nor would you, I'd hazard a guess.

But who else?

"Among national leaders with offshore wealth are Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan’s prime minister; Ayad Allawi, ex-interim prime minister and former vice-president of Iraq; Petro Poroshenko, president of Ukraine; Alaa Mubarak, son of Egypt’s former president; and the prime minister of Iceland, Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson."

Wait, Iceland?

I... I'm really shocked. I really am, guys. I know Iceland aren't exactly socialists as we perceive them, and I know that they thrive at least partially through... well, almost indie isolationism, being the only ones who imprisoned the bankers and bailed the people out instead of the other way around, but...

I thought better of their leadership than this. A tiny part of my faith in the world just got broken, just a little bit. A hairline fracture in my belief in the integrity of our global people. Small, but there, and hard to heal.

Ok.

Next please.

"An offshore investment fund run by the father of British prime minister David Cameron avoided ever having to pay tax in Britain by hiring a small army of Bahamas residents to sign its paperwork. The fund has been registered with HM Revenue and Customs since its inception and has filed detailed tax returns every year."

This surprised me. This really did. A British newspaper, even starting to look like it's calling out the PM? I've only really seen The Independent - and I suppose The Morning Star, although we all expect them to do it - do this regularly. The Guardian does it sparingly, but by God they know when to.

The Guardian's article on this goes on to say that not all people who use offshore banking and/or storage are crooks.

And they're right.

There are legitimate reasons to do this. In some countries, it may well be unsafe to put everything in the locale, where it could get stolen, or where security measures are less adequate. I've been told that many companies in Russia do this, for example, and I can understand why. In fact, good on them. That's a logical step in the protection of their funds, and as long as they still pay taxes like a good bunch of lads, then I have no problem with it.

The Guardian also informs us, politely as always, the a good number of the people who do this are crooks. They used words like 'money laundering' and 'criminal' too. I'm so proud of them.

But then, and you won't (totally will) believe this...

A senior Tory MP claimed that it was wrong to look into this. Not because of privacy, but because it would damage the livelihoods of the tax avoiders themselves. He said that overseas services were 'entitled' to exploit us like this.

Entitled.

What the fuck, sir? 

Sir, what the fuck?

I should mention that this is the same Tory who was against child abuse inquiries by the police.

Methinks there should be some inquiries into him. His name is Dominic Grieve, and I'd sure as hell like to give him some grief.

The Prime Minister couldn't keep his official trap shut either. When he was asked about all this, he had his spokesman say - because he couldn't look us in the eyes himself - that it was, I quote, '... a private matter.'

No. No it isn't. That's not how government works, that's not how taxes work. As the leader of the current ruling party, and therefore the leader of the British People's Government, you are accountable to the people you seem to consider yourself superior to, and this kind of behaviour is pissing everyone off, you pigfucking trotterlicker! Ooh, he makes my blood fucking boil!

But.

Something good has come of this.

Because people are finally starting to really wake up.

Icelandic government offices have been egged by protestors, in a passionate display of political, humanist, and populist fervour.

Bernie Sanders' support has been, is now, and is about to skyrocket.

The Left is back, baby. And stronger than ever.

Clements Attlee, Nye Bevan, and all the great heroes of our past?

I think they might even be proud of us.



Thanks for having a read, everyone. There ought to be another one later, about the lady being punished for abortion in Northern Ireland, and my disgust at the situation.

~ Baxster Brand

- PS: Here are the links to the newsposts.

http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papers

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/britain-should-not-crack-down-on-tax-havens-as-it-would-destroy-their-livelihoods-senior-tory-mp-a6969121.html

Birdie Sanders

Wow. I don't believe it. There must be a God, because as I'm sure you know, wildlife is now officially attracted to the aura of peace, goodwill, and socialism that surrounds and harmonises with Bernie Sanders.

Crikey, what a guy.

And yeah, this really did happen, we weren't just all high for like, his entire speech.

And what's even better?

The Birdie then inspires him, this great old fluffy haired Jewish guy, to immediately talk about how the bird represents World Peace.

I think Bernie Sanders - I mean, Birdie Sanders - would actually pursue World Peace, were he elected as President of the United States of America.

Fuck, I am so happy about this.

~ Baxster Brand