"... we would we able to totally obliterate them."
Her reasoning is that Israel faces serious and aggressive threats from organisations such as the 'Iranian Revolutionary Guard' whom I have actually personally never heard of. Seriously, I had to google them as I wrote this.
And when I googled them, I'll admit they definitely seemed like a bit of a fundamentalist group.
But, and I will admit I was almost surprised to hear this, they're actually not terrorists at all.
There was, I think, one report of a couple of Revolutionary Guards operating in... Iraq, I think? During another, larger conflict there. Which is, I will admit, is pretty questionable again - as is their vow to combat not only threats to their state, but any 'Deviant Movements' which could definitely be applied to political threats in their own borders if they really wanted it to be...
But they're not terrorists.
And also, as a group of their own, they have had no more than two altercations with any sort of Israeli force, and one was just a drone that was, apparently, headed towards a civilian nuclear site within Iran's borders. They shot it down - as they were pretty justified in doing, no matter the origin of the drone - and Israel didn't even comment.
The other was when a few of their number were killed training fighters in Lebanon, by Israeli forces.
But what about the history between Iran and Israel as a whole, Baxster? Surely there is some justification there? Surely Iran is a legitimate threat?
Well, the short answer is that while their history is tense and Iran is not known for liking Israel - though remember, nor am I - no. Iran is not a legitimate threat.
Clinton would have us all believe that Iran is led by a fundamentalist Islamic government who want to kill all the westerners - which is not true, as their government, as far as I can see, is remarkably nonplussed for a conservative Islamic government, indeed, a theocracy which I must say I also do not agree with.
She would also have you believe that Iran possesses nuclear weapons.
They do not.
There is absolutely no evidence to suggest - and even evidence against the theory that Iran has any sort of nuclear technology other than civilian.
What evidence?
I do not know. The military don't like to give it out, and these are military analysts saying this.
Going further into it, Hillary Clinton also backs the usage of cluster bombs, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons in war. She calls them deterrents, but these are designed as First Strike weapons - which would make them, even if used as deterrents, agents of empirical oppression.
For a people so obsessed with freedom, these Americans are awfully Imperial.
I do hope she's actually arrested as a result of this FBI investigation. Let Bernie take her place, and thrash Trump as we know he would.
~ Baxster Brand
No comments:
Post a Comment